Panorama da Arquitetura Corporativa na Administração Pública do Brasil

Luisa Vilela-Cury, Karoll Haussler Carneiro Ramos, Joysse Vasconcelos França, Lana Montezano

Abstract


Arquitetura corporativa (AC) é uma ferramenta mundialmente adotada por governos de alto desempenho em governança pública que viabiliza uma gestão da informação integrada. Este artigo investiga o desenvolvimento do Framework de Arquitetura Corporativa para Interoperabilidade no Apoio à Governança (FACIN) do Governo Federal do Brasil, analisando os fatores que justificam sua adoção e os benefícios esperados desta implantação. Foi realizada análise de conteúdo e triangulação acerca de documentos que subsidiaram a elaboração do FACIN e dos artefatos produzidos. Verificou-se que, apesar da AC oportunizar uma gestão mais racional e eficiente e promover governança, a introdução do modelo no Brasil ainda precisa superar barreiras gerenciais e políticas.

Keywords


arquitetura corporativa; FACIN; administração pública; gestão da informação; interoperabilidade

References


AlSoufi, A. (2012). Bahrain National Enterprise Architecture Framework: a Platform towards a GCC EA Initiative. GSTF Journal on Computing, 2(1).

Australian Government Information Management Office. (2007). Australian government architecture reference models. (Vol. 1). http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-74122

Bakar, N. A. A., Kama, N., & Harihodin, S. (2016). Enterprise Architecture Development and Implementation in Public Sector: the Malaysian Perspective. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 88(1).

Bakar, N. A. A., & Selamat, H. (2016). Investigating Enterprise Architecture implementation in public sector organisation: A case study of Ministry of Health Malaysia. International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Bakar, N. A. A., Selamat, H., & Kama, M. N. (2017). Assessing the Capability and Priority of Enterprise Architecture Implementation in Malaysian Public Sector. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Langkawi.

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo (70ª ed.). São Paulo.

Belloquim, A. (2014) Arquitetura Corporativa: Alinhando Estratégia e Execução. https://www.governodigital.gov.br/transformacao/compras/orientacoes/interoperabilidade/governanca-e-interoperabilidade/historico/seminario-eping/mesa3.pdf

Bernus, P., & Nemes, L. (1994). A framework to define a generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology ICARCV '94. International Conference on Automation Robotics and Computer Vision, Singapore.

Bernus, P., Noran, O., & Molina, A. (2015). Enterprise architecture: Twenty years of the GERAM framework. Annual Reviews in Control, 39, 83-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2015.03.008

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M. E., Byrd, T. A., & Simmons, L. L. (2011). The Role of Enterprise Architecture in the Questforit Value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(2), 73-80. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol10/iss2/5

Chakravarti, B., & Varma, V. (2008). An enterprise architecture framework for building service oriented e-governance portal. TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

Costa, M. V. (2017, Setembro). FACIN: Framework de Arquitetura Corporativa para Interoperabilidade no Apoio à Governança [Apresentação em Conferência]. TI Pública – Conectando o Governo com a Sociedade Digital, Porto de Galinhas, PE, Brasil.

Coutinho, A. V., da Costa M. V., Musafir, V., Nunes V., & Tanaka, S. (2017a). FACIN: Modelo de Conteúdo. Gov.br. http://www.participa.br/articles/public/0056/4482/Modelo_de_Conteudo_v1.5.pdf

Coutinho, A. V., Mello, A. P., Riccioppo, A., Passos, G., Garcia, H., Teixeira C., Cappelli, C., Nunes, V., da Costa M. V., & Tanaka, S. (2017b). FACIN: Visão Executiva. Gov.br http://www.participa.br/articles/public/0056/4481/FACIN_Visao_Executiva_v2.1.pdf

Decreto de 3 de Abril de 2000. (2000). Institui Grupo de Trabalho Interministerial para examinar e propor políticas, diretrizes e normas relacionadas com as novas formas eletrônicas de interação. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/dnn/2000/dnn8917.htm

Decreto nº 8.638, de 15 de Janeiro de 2016. (2016). Institui a Política de Governança Digital no âmbito dos órgãos e das entidades da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/d8638.htm

Defense Information Systems Agency Center for Standards. (1996). Department of Defense Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management. (TAFIM Standard V. 3). United States Department of Defense. http://everyspec.com/DoD/DOD-General/download.php?spec=DISA_TAFIM_VOL1.007539.pdf

European Commission. (2017). EIRA Support Series: How does the EIRA support interoperability? https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2017-01/how_does_eira_support_interoperability_v1_0_0.pdf

Executive Office of the President of the United States. (2013). Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework: Version 2. (FEAF Standard V. 2). https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/egov_docs/fea_v2.pdf

Gomes, R. (2015). Resilience and enterprise architecture in SMES. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12, 525-540.

Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101487.

Governo Digital. (2018a). Guia de papeis e responsabilidades e conhecimentos. Governo Federal do Brasil. https://www.governodigital.gov.br/transformacao/compras/orientacoes/interoperabilidade/governanca-e-interoperabilidade/papeis-responsabilidades-e-conhecimentos-facin.pdf

Governo Digital. (2018b). Calendário. Governo Federal do Brasil. https://www.governodigital.gov.br/transformacao/compras/orientacoes/interoperabilidade/governanca-e-interoperabilidade/calendario

Gürdür, D., & Asplund, F. (2018). A systematic review to merge discourses: Interoperability, integration and cyber-physical systems. Journal of Industrial information integration, 9, 14-23.

Hussein, S. S., Mahrin, M. N. R., & Maarop, N. (2017). Preliminary Study of Malaysian Public Sector (MPS) Transformation Readiness through Enterprise Architecture (EA) Establishment. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Malasya, 229.

Lee, S., Oh, S. W., & Nam, K. (2016). Transformational and transactional factors for the successful implementation of enterprise architecture in public sector. Sustainability, 8(5), 456.

Marosin, D. (2013). Towards a Principle-Based Framework for Enterprise Architecture Rationalization. CAiSE (Doctoral Consortium).

Masuda, Y., Zimmermann, A., Viswanathan, M., Bass, M., Nakamura, O., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Adaptive Enterprise Architecture for the Digital Healthcare Industry: A Digital Platform for Drug Development. Information, 12(2), 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/info12020067

Mondorf, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2016). Requirements for an architecture framework for Pan-European e-Government Services. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 135-150). Springer, Cham.

Nam, K., Oh, S. W., Kim, S. K., Goo, J. & Khan, M. S. (2016). Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture in the Korean Public Sector: Transformational Change vs. Transactional Change. Sustainability, 8 (11), 1074.

Nama, G. F., & Kurniawan, D. (2017, November). An enterprise architecture planning for higher education using the open group architecture framework (togaf): Case study University of Lampung. In 2017 Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

NASCIO. (2003). NASCIO Enterprise Architecture maturity model. National Association of State Chief Information Officers.

Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2017). Using enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313-338.

Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2020). The benefits of enterprise architecture in organizational transformation. Business & information systems engineering, 62(6), 585-597.

Nunes, VT, Cappelli, C., & Costa, MV. (2017). FACIN: The Brazilian Government Enterprise Architecture Framework. In ICEIS (3) (pp. 433-439).

Oberhauser, R. (2018). The Digital Diamond Framework: An Enterprise Architecture Framework for the Digital Age. Em IARIA (Eds,) The Tenth International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management (pp. 77-82). https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=eknow_2018_4_40_60092

Ramos, K. H. C., Souza, G. D. A., & Rosa, A. F. (2019). Literature Review Studies in Public Sector’s Enterprise Architecture. In ICEIS (2) (pp. 642-649).

Restivo, L, & Apostolidis, T. (2019). Triangulating qualitative approaches within mixed methods designs: A theory-driven proposal based on a French research in social health psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 16(3), 392-416.

Sajid, M., & Ahsan, K. (2016). Role of enterprise architecture in healthcare organizations and knowledge-based medical diagnosis system. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13, 181-192.

Shanks, G., Gloet, M., Someh, I. A., Frampton, K., & Tamm, T. (2018). Achieving benefits with enterprise architecture. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(2), 139-156.

The Open Group. (2011). The Open Group Architecture Framework Version 9.1. (TOGAF Standard V. 9.1). https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf91-doc/arch/

United States Department of Defense (2017). DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.02. https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoD-Architecture-Framework/dodaf20_background/,%20recuperado%20em%2017%20de%20janeiro,%202019/

United States Department of Defense. (2007). DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.5. https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/DODAF/DoDAF_Volume_I.pdf

United States Federal Chief Information Officers Council. (1999). Federal enterprise architecture framework version 1.1. 80, 3-1.

Varveris, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Building Enterprise Architectures with TOGAF. White Paper.

Verbeeten, F. H., & Speklé, R. F. (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: Empirical evidence on new public management. Organization studies, 36(7), 953-978.

Zachman, J. A. (1996). The framework for enterprise architecture: background, description and utility. Zachman International, 1-5.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-1775202320001

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management

Licensed under