E-Learning Management Systems- A Feature-based Comparative Analysis

Saeed Salah, Mahmoud Thabet

Resumo


One of the main important resources for higher education is a Learning Management System (LMS), which has shown an enhancement of students’ progress with high quality learning outcomes worldwide. Many e-learning tools exist, each one has its own weaknesses and strongest points to the online learning process. This number increases continuously, and the existing tools are being updated, redeveloped, and upgraded. The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive comparative analysis between existing e-learning management systems. Unlike other relevant studies that have narrow scope either in terms of the number of tools or the number of comparative features, this work considers top twenty, highly recommended tools, both open source and commercial. Furthermore, more than twenty evaluation features were used carefully to fulfil students’ and instructors’ current needs. The results of this study have shown that Moodle outperforms the others and it is considered as the best free open source tool for educational purposes. It supports more than 100 different languages and provides its services to more than tens of millions of customers worldwide. Besides to Moodle, Chamilo, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Sakai have more built-in features that provide services to educational institutions. Also, this study showed that Docebo, SkyPrep, ProProfs, SAP Litmos, Moodle, TotaraLearn, Open edX and Opigno systems have more built-in security mechanisms such as antispam, antivirus, IP Blocker, data protection and complex password enforcement. Most considered systems have gamification features except Schoology, ATutor, Sakai, and Ilias, and most commercial systems can offer 24/7 customer care services, except Edmodo and Telnet, whereas open source tools offer this service on specific time slots except Opigno, Ilias, TotaraLearn, Chamilo, and Canvas where the service is offered 24/7.

Palavras-chave


Learning Management System (LMS); E-learning; Open Source; Commercial; Moodle; Evaluation.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Oliveira, P.C., Cunha, C., & Nakayama, M.K. (2015). Learning Management Systems (LMS) and e-learning management: an integrative review and research agenda. Jistem Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13, 157-180.

Abdulaziz, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., Allhibi, A. (2019). Utilization of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education system: A case review for Saudi Arabia, International Conference on Energy and Power, ICEP2018, 13-15.

Kundi, G. M., Nawaz, A., & Khan, S. (2010). The predictors of success for e-learning in higher education institutions (HEIs) in N-W.F.P, Pakistan. Journal of Information Systems & Technology Management, 7(3), 545+.

Kulshrestha, T. & Kant, A. (2013). Benefits of learning management system (LMS) in Indian education, International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Technology (IJCSET), 4(8).

Lopes, A. (2014). Learning management system in higher education, In Proceedings of EDULEARN14 Conference, 7th to 9th July 2014, 5360-5365, Barcelona, Spain.

Han, I & Shin, W. (2016). The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students, Computers & Education, 102, 79-89.

Capper, I. (2001). E-learning growth and promise for the developing world, TechKnowLogia, 2(2), 7-10.

Grönlund, Å. & Islam, Y. (2010. A mobile e-learning environment for developing countries: The Bangladesh virtual interactive classroom, Information Technology for Development, 16(4), 244-259.

Kraleva, R., Kralev, V., Kostadinova, D. (2019). A methodology for the analysis of block-based programming languages appropriate for children, Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 13(1), 1-10.

Sheeba, T., & Krishnan, R. (2019). Automatic detection of students learning style in learning management system, In Proc. of the Smart Technologies and Innovation for a Sustainable Future, Springer, 45-53.

Narayan, V., Herrington, J., & Cochrane, T. (2019). Design principles for heutagogical learning: Implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 86-101.

Valova, I., & Marinov, M. (2019). Facebook as a tool aiding university education-whether it is possible and useful, TEM Journal, 8(2), 670-676.

Pankaja, N., & Raj P. K., M. (2013). Proprietary software versus open source software for Education, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 2 (7), 124-130.

Deborah, J., Karthika, R., Vijayakumar, P., Bharat, R., & Wang, Y. (2019). Secure online examination system for e-learning, IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1-4, doi: 10.1109/CCECE43985.2019.9052408.

Nadirah, N., Kasim, M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(6).

Fertalj, K., Jerkovic, H., & Hlupic, N. (2007). Comparison of e-Learning Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on E-Activities, Venice: WSEAS, 189-194.

Erdenebaatar, A., Zolboo, D., & Baigaltugs, S. (2011). Comparison of the learning management systems. International Conference EICHTE-2011, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 1, 2011.

Cavus, N., & Zabadi, T. (2014). A comparison of open source learning management systems, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 143, 521-526.

Dobre, I. (2015). Learning management systems for higher education¬- an overview of available options for Higher Education Organizations, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 180, 313-320.

Poulovaa, P., Simonovaa, I., & Manenovab, M. (2015). Which one or another? Comparative analysis of selected LMS, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 186, 1302-1308.

Subramanian, P., Zainuddin, N., & Alatawi, S. (2014). A study of comparison between Moodle and Blackboard based on case studies for better LMS, Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 2014.

Al-Ajlan, S. (2012). A comparative study between e-learning features. In Tech, 332, 03-Feb-2012.

Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems, International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 9(4), 1190-1198.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-1775202118003