The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology

PC Lai

Abstract


This paper contributes to the existing literature by comprehensively reviewing the concepts, applications and development of technology adoption models and theories based on the literature review with the focus on potential application for the novelty technology of single platform E-payment. These included, but were not restricted to, the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations (DIT) (Rogers, 1995), the Theory of Reasonable Action (TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985, 1991), Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour, (Taylor and Todd, 1995), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, Bogozzi and Warshaw, 1989, Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2) Venkatesh and Davis (2000) and Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) Venkatesh and Bala (2008). These reviews will shed some light and potential applications for technology applications for future researchers to conceptualize, distinguish and comprehend the underlying technology models and theories that may affect the previous, current and future application of technology adoption.

Keywords


TAM, TRA, TBP, DIT, TTF, technology adoption, single platform E-payment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Academic Press, Inc. 179-211.

Bagozzi, R.P. (2007) The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 244-254.

Chau, P. Y. K., and Hu, P., J. (2002). Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (4), 191-229.

Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts, United States: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Davis, F. D., Bogozzi, R., P., & Warshaw, P., R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.

Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 38, (3), 475–487

Davis, F. D., and V. Venkatesh. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments Internet. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 45 19–45.

Dapp. T, Stobbe, A., and Wruuck P. 2012. The future of (mobile) payments - New (online) players competing with banks, Deutsche Bank Research, 20th December 2012, pp.1-31.

Dewan & Chen. (2005). Mobile payment adoption in the US: A cross-industry, cross platform solution. Journal of Information Privacy and Security. 1 (2), 4 – 25.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass; Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213-236.

Han, S. (2003). Individual adoption of information systems in organisations: a literature review of technology acceptance model TUCS Technical Report 540; TUCS.

Henderson, R. & Divett., M., J. (2003). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 383-395.

Lai P. C (2006). The significant of E-business and knowledge-based Customer Relationship in the E-market Place Environment. INTI Journal, 2 (1) 552-559.

Lai, P. C. (2007). The Chip Technology Management Implication in the Era of Globalization: Malaysian Consumers’ Perspective, Asia Pacific Business Review, 3(1), 91-96

Lai P. C. (2010). E-business and E-banking. Japan Society for Software Science and Technology, Itech research group.

Lai, P. C. (2014) “Factors influencing consumers’ intention to use a single platform E-payment System.” UNITEN.

Lai, P. C. (2013) “Cashless, Cardless, Contactless and Convenience of MySIMTM.” GlobalCLAS Technology..

Lai P. C. & Ahmad, Z. A. (2014). Perceived Enjoyment of Malaysian consumers’ intention to use a single platform E-payment. Paper presented at International Conference on Liberal Arts & Social Sciences., 25th - 29th April, 2014, Hanoi, Vietnam

Lai P. C. & Zainal A. A., (2015). Consumers’ Intention to Use a Single Platform E-Payment System: A Study among Malaysian Internet and Mobile Banking Users. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. (20) (1) 1-13

Lai P. C. & Zainal A.A, (2015). Perceived Risk as an Extension to TAM Model: Consumers’ Intention To Use A Single Platform E-Payment. Australia Journal Basic and Applied Science, 9(2): 323-330.

Lai, P. C. (2016) Design and Security impact on consumers’ intention to use single platform E-payment, Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 22 (1), 111-122

Lee, T.M., & Jun, J.K. (2007). The role of contextual marketing offer in Mobile commerce acceptance: comparison between Mobile Commerce users and nonusers. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 5(3), 339-356.

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model; past, present and future. Communication of AIS, 12 (50), 752-780.

Luarn, P., & Lin, H., H. (2005). “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking.” Computers I Human Behavior, 21, 873-891.

Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Journal of Internet Research, 13(2), 206-222.

Lovelock, C. (2001). Services Marketing, People, Technology, Strategy, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.

Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies:Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50-65.

Mun Y. Yi, Joyce D. J., Jae S. P. & Janice C. P. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 43, 350-363

Parasuraman, A., & Colby L. C. (2001). Techno-Ready Marketing, The Free Press.

Paul L., John I., & Pierre, C. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191–204.

Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed., New York: The Free Press

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., Warshaw. P. R., (1998) The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15, (3) 325-343

Shih, Y.Y. & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14 (3), 213-223.

Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.

Venkatesh,V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. (2000). Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask For Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly (24:1), 115-139.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., & Davis, G.B. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.

Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda onInterventions. Decision Science, 39 (2), 273-312.

Yang, K.C.C. (2005). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore. Telematics and Informatics. 22, 257-277

Yi, M.Y., Jackson, J.D., Park, J.S. & Probst, J.C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 43 (3), 350-363.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002

Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management

Licensed under