Using University Ranking Systems to Predict Usability of University Websites

Layla Hasan


This research investigated whether a university ranking system called Eduroute could provide useful information regarding the usability of universities’ websites. A comparison was conducted between the results obtained by Eduroute regarding the ranking of the top three universities in Jordan, and the results obtained by the heuristic evaluation method regarding the usability of the top three universities’ websites. Before employing the heuristic evaluation method, two steps were taken: Investigating the most frequently visited pages on a university’s website from the viewpoint of 237 students, and developing a set of comprehensive heuristics specific to educational websites. Then, five heuristic evaluators were selected and asked to visit all the pages determined by the 237 students using the developed heuristics while evaluating each website. The results proved that the ranking of the three universities at Eduroute was an indicator regarding the overall usability of the sites; the first ranked university at Eduroute had the lowest number of usability problems identified by the evaluators, while the least ranked university had the largest number of usability problems. The heuristic evaluators also identified fourteen common usability problems on the three tested websites related to navigation, design, content, and ease of use and communication.


Usability; university ranking system; Eduroute; Jordan; heuristic evaluation; educational websites.

Full Text:



Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firm’s web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186.

Anonymous. (2006). Step-by-Step Usability Guide. Retrieved from:

Astani, M. (2003). An empirical study of the effectiveness of universities’ web sites. Issues in Information Systems, 4, 14-20.

Astani, M., & Elhindi, M. (2008). An empirical study of university websites. Issues in Information Systems, IX(2), 460-465.

Eduroute. (2011). Retrieved from:

Gonzalez, M., Granollers, T., & Pascual, A. (2008). Testing website usability in Spanish-speaking academia through heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough. Journal of Universal Computer Sciences, 14(9), 1513-1528.

Kostaras, N., & Xenos, M. (2007). Assessing educational web-site usability using heuristic evaluation rules. Proceedings of 11th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, Patras, Greece.

Lencastre, J., & Chaves, J. (2008). A usability evaluation of educational websites. Proceedings of EADTU Conference, Poitiers, France.

Mentes, A., & Turan, A. (2012). Assessing the usability of university websites: an empirical study on Namic Kemal University. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 11(3), 61-69.

Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of CHI’90, ACM, Seattle, WA, USA, 249-256.

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J. & Mack, R. L. (Ed), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25-64.

Nielsen, J., (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved from:

Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity, New Riders Publishing.

Noiwan, J., & Norcio, A. (2000). A comparison analysis on web heuristic usability between Thai academic web sites and US academic web sites. Proceedings of SGI, World Multi Conference on Systems, Cybermetrics and Informatics, Concepts and Applications of Systems, Cybermetrics and Informatics, Orlando, Florida, USA.

Peterson, K. (2006). Academic web site design and academic templates: where does the library fit. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(4), 217-221.

Pierce, K. (2005). Web site usability report for Harvard university. Technical Report, Capella University.

Sandvig, J., & Bajwa, D. (2004). Information seeking on university web sites: an exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 25(1), 13-22.

The Academic Ranking of World Universities. (2011). Retrieved from:

The QS World University Rankings. (2011). Retrieved from:

Toit, M., & Bothma, C. (2010). Evaluating the usability of an academic marketing department’s website from a marketing student’s perspective. International Retail and Marketing Review, 5(1), 15-24.

Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. (2011). Retrieved from:

Zhang, P., Dran, G. von, Blake, P., & Pipithsuksunt, V. (2000). A comparison of the most important website features in different domains: an empirical study of user perceptions. Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS'2000), Long Beach, CA., August 10-13, 1367-1372.

International Colleges & Universities. (2011). Retrieved from:


Copyright (c)

Licensed under