Software Process Assessment and Improvement Using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
BARTHÉLEMY, J.; R. BISDORFF, R., e; COPPIN, G. Human centered processes and decision support systems, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 136, No. 2, Pag.: 233-252, 2002.
CMMI V1.1 – SCAMPI V1.1 – Class A Appraisal Results. Carnegie Mellon University. Software Engineering Institute. www.sei.cmu.edu, 2004.
CMMI-SE/SW CONTINUOUS REPRESENTATION. CMMI for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering/Integrated Product and Process Development, Version 1.02, Continuous Representation. www.sei.cmu.edu, 2002.
CMMI-SE/SW STAGED REPRESENTATION. CMMI for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering/Integrated Product and Process Development, Version 1.02, Staged Representation. www.sei.cmu.edu, 2002.
ENSSLIN, L.; NETO G.; ZANELLA I.; NORONHA, S. Apoio à Decisão: Metodologias para Estruturação de Problemas e Avaliação Multicritério de Alternativas. INSULAR, LabMCDA; Florianópolis- SC; 2002.
ISO/IEC15504-1: Information Technology – Software Process Assessment Part 1: Concepts and Introductory Guide. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N1592.6, 1996.
ISO/IEC15504-2: Information Technology – Software Process Assessment Part 2: A Reference Model For Processes And Process Capability. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N1594, 1996.
ISO/IEC15504-3: Information Technology – Software Process Assessment Part 3: Rating Processes. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N1594, 1996.
LEE, H.; JUNG, H.; CHUNG, C.; LEE, J.; LEE, K.; JEONG, H. Analysis of interrater agreement in ISO/IEC 15504-based software process assessment. Quality Software, 2001. Proceedings.Second Asia-Pacific Conference on, Vol., Iss., Pages:341-348, 2001.
NIAZI, M.; WILSON, D.; ZOWGHI, D. A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study. The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 74, Pag.: 155-172, 2003
PITTERMAN, B. Telcordia technologies: the journey to high maturity. IEEE Software (July–August), 89–96, 2000.
KUILBOER, J.; ASHRAFI, N. Software process and product improvement: an empirical assessment, Information and Software Technology, Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 27-34, 2000.
RAINER, A. e HALL, T. Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 62, No. 2, Pag.: 71-84., 2002.
SAIEDIAN, H.; MCCLANAHAN, L. A study of two frameworks for quality software process. Symposium on Applied Computing, Nashville, Tennessee, Estados Unidos, Pag.: 434 – 439, 1995.
SHEARD, S.; ROEDLER G. Interpreting continuous-view capability models for higher levels of maturity. Systems Engineering Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Vol. 2, No. 1, Pag.: 15-31, 1999.
WANG, Y.; COURT, I.; ROSS, M.; STAPLES, G.; KING, G. Towards a Software Process Reference Model (SPRM), Proceedings of International Conference on Sofrware Process Improvement (SPI’96), Brighton, 1996
WANG, Y., KING, G., DORLING, A., PATEL, D., COURT, I., STAPLES, G. ROSS, M., A Worldwide Survey of Base Process Activities Towards Software Engineering Process Excellence, IEEE, 1998.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752012000300003
Copyright (c)